show full names in dependents output
#5573
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Nice thanks @mitchellwrosen! I like the grayed-out prefix! I'd say it's a nice bonus; if it is much work either for you or ucm then I wouldn't worry about it much. |
|
It's not much work! |
|
@aryairani any thoughts on this? |
|
Sorry I didn't see this, and normally only scan over non-draft PRs. I like it too if it's easy. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
This PR modifies
dependentsto show fully-qualified names instead of suffixified names.However, I wonder if we should go a little further, and render the names something like this, showing both the fully-qualified name and its shortest unique suffix:
@aryairani / @ceedubs WDTY?
Still to do:
dependenciescommand