Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test on CI that update-meson is properly ran #39527
Test on CI that update-meson is properly ran #39527
Changes from 2 commits
92bc994
82a439a
b7ae258
44e7572
c370580
d796a29
6bf8c80
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this can be combined with the previous step.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can't find some other good way to ensure simultaneously
also the purpose of
git diff
is to print out the diff, there's no need to print out the diff when there's no change.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alternatively we could just remove the whole continue-on-error and let the test not run when update-meson is not ran (which might not be that bad of an idea? If pull request author is quickly notified then they can quickly fix the thing and repush)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would prefer this yes. It's the simplest method to maintain and also the one with the least surprising outcomes (if you forget to add a python file in the meson build, then you almost surely get 'confusing' test failures). Alternatively, you could argue that it's a kind of "linter"/checker and thus should be moved to the Lint workflow.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't quite understand the purpose of this check. Why would we want to have two steps that fail due to one reason?