support defining quaternion orders from a generating set #38829
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
yyyyx4
added
t: enhancement
p: minor / 4
c: algebra
s: needs review
and removed
s: needs review
labels
|
Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit c0d54ce; changes) is ready! 🎉 |
|
There are many doctests failing in |
...rather than a basis only
yyyyx4
force-pushed
the
public/support_defining_quaternion_orders_from_generators
branch
from
7a3a319 to
c0d54ce
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Same as #36759, but for orders instead of ideals.
(Eventually, both should become a subclass of the same "quaternion lattice" type anyway...)