Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Pseudomorphism Implementation for Free Modules #37214

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Feb 21, 2025

Conversation

ymusleh
Copy link
Contributor

@ymusleh ymusleh commented Feb 1, 2024

The goal of this PR is to add a basic implementation of pseudomorphisms of free modules.

Let $M$ be a free module over a ring $R$. Let $\theta: R \to R$ be a ring homomorphism and $\delta: R \to R$ a ring $\theta$-derivation.

A pseudomorphism $f: M \to M$ is a map twisted by $(\theta, \delta)$ such that

$f(\lambda x) = \theta(\lambda)f(x) + \delta(\lambda)x$

$f$ can be specified by a matrix representing its action on a basis for $M$.

Currently this PR implements the following functionality:

  • Constructors for pseudomorphisms and the space of pseudomorphisms with a fixed twist
  • Call methods to apply pseudomorphisms to a fixed element of the module
  • Call method for pseudohomspace to coerce matrix or module morphisms to a pseudomorphism

See the documentation for more details.

📝 Checklist

  • The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory.
  • The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
  • I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
  • I have created tests covering the changes.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

⌛ Dependencies

None

@vneiger vneiger added the sd125 sage days 125 label Feb 1, 2024
Copy link

Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit 1134baa; changes) is ready! 🎉

@ymusleh
Copy link
Contributor Author

ymusleh commented Feb 25, 2024

@xcaruso What is your opinion on continuing with this since I see you closed the Anderson motive PR, which was a major motivation for implementing pseudomorphisms. Should we still go ahead and get this merged?

@xcaruso
Copy link
Contributor

xcaruso commented Feb 26, 2024

Yes.
I closed the PR on Anderson motive by mistake because I got a problem when trying to push. So I finally created a new branch on my github account: https://github.com/xcaruso/sage/tree/anderson-motives
I will re-create a PR (more probably, several PRs) when this will be ready.

@xcaruso xcaruso added sd128 tickets of Sage Days 128 Le Teich and removed sd128 tickets of Sage Days 128 Le Teich labels Feb 11, 2025
@vbraun vbraun merged commit 5802930 into sagemath:develop Feb 21, 2025
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants