8293345: SunPKCS11 provider checks on PKCS11 Mechanism are problematic

[vieiro]

Clean backport of JDK-8293345 (but a copyright line, that is) for parity with 11.0.27-oracle.

Tier 1 tests pass in Linux.

---

Progress

• JDK-8293345 needs maintainer approval
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change requires CSR request JDK-8343498 to be approved

Issues

• JDK-8293345: SunPKCS11 provider checks on PKCS11 Mechanism are problematic (Enhancement - P3 - Requested)
• JDK-8343498: SunPKCS11 provider checks on PKCS11 Mechanism are problematic (CSR)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2983/head:pull/2983
$ git checkout pull/2983

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2983
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2983/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2983

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2983

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2983.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back vieiro! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[openjdk]

⚠️ @vieiro This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (8e1185e6)

[vieiro]

/approval request Let's allow PCKS11 legacy mechanisms in JDK11 too, as in 11.0.27-oracle and upper OpenJDK versions.

[openjdk]

@vieiro
8293345: The approval request has been created successfully.

[bridgekeeper]

@vieiro This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

[vieiro]

Let's keep it open. I may want to run additional tests too.