-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
treewide/nixos: remove with lib;
part 11
#369234
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
treewide/nixos: remove with lib;
part 11
#369234
Conversation
6d90711
to
d9a74a3
Compare
d9a74a3
to
6c14bd4
Compare
6c14bd4
to
8b69ba0
Compare
@@ -60,7 +57,7 @@ let | |||
exit $_status | |||
''; | |||
|
|||
path = with pkgs; map getBin | |||
path = with pkgs; map lib.getBin |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
somehow I had to do this manually...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I think your script has an error when there's an inner with
.
Based on my experience merging the other PRs, Felix (@Stunkymonkey), I'm going to sit it out for a while. I don't have enough confidence there are zero defects here, and I know with the new script, I'd need to actually run tests against all the modules here -- which I don't have the computing power to do, and I don't think you do either. |
Description of changes
part of #208242
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.