coreboot-utils: turn into package set

[ninelore]

After discussing it with @felixsinger, we came to the conclusion that coreboot-utils should be a package set.

Looking for feedback on the implementation as well as how I should handle the breaking changes.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[Mindavi]

I generally have the feeling we're trying to move towards less package sets, not more. But I might not be completely up to date with the latest standards.

[danth]

I generally have the feeling we're trying to move towards less package sets, not more.

This seems to be the case with the GNOME packages, at least.

[ninelore]

this should be similar to what has been done to nerd-fonts

[ninelore]

TODO: pkgs.coreboot-utils is no longer a derivation but a set. I wasn't able to implement a proper throw with a helpful message yet