Skip to content

Issues: ISO-TC211/StandardsTracker

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear current search query, filters, and sorts
110 Open 4 Closed
110 Open 4 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

General concern from AHG06 eGovernment regarding ISO 19107 Spatial Schema 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema 19137 Geographic information — Core profile of the spatial schema GOM ISO/TC 211 Group for Ontology Maintenance (GOM) - AG 6
#446 opened May 9, 2022 by JanHjelmager
2
19107 Mismatch between figure (UML) and standard for constructor Geometry(binary: Binary):Geometry 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema
#437 opened Apr 21, 2022 by heidivanparys
Basic types and definitions for reference for 19103 and or 19107 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema
#418 opened Aug 25, 2021 by wilkesg
12
The “defining standard” 19107 no longer defines the terms “direct position”. 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema 19123-1 Geographic information — Schema for coverage geometry and functions — Part 1: Fundamentals TMG ISO/TC 211 Terminology Maintenance Group (TMG) - AG 7 WG6 ISO/TC 211 WG6, Imagery WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#400 opened Jun 24, 2021 by wilkesg
@geomancer2012
4
GeometricCoordinateSystem attribute & operation spelling errors in ISO 19107 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema technical A specific technical issue identified within a published standard/document. WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#395 opened Jun 15, 2021 by jetgeo
Oppisite() operation for interface Orientable in ISO 19107 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema technical A specific technical issue identified within a published standard/document. WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#394 opened Jun 15, 2021 by jetgeo
"Boolen" datatype in "equal" operation in ISO 19107 Fig 10 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema technical A specific technical issue identified within a published standard/document. WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#393 opened Jun 15, 2021 by jetgeo
the constraints should be modified 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema editorial Editorial issue identified within a published standard/document. (typos, numbering, etc.) WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#341 opened Mar 17, 2021 by isotc211
@isotc211
2
the datatype of attributes of class "Topology" has errors 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema technical A specific technical issue identified within a published standard/document. WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#342 opened Mar 17, 2021 by isotc211
@isotc211
REQ.238 should be modified. 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema technical A specific technical issue identified within a published standard/document. WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#339 opened Mar 17, 2021 by isotc211
@isotc211
3
muliplicity of association role "node" of Edge should be changed. 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema technical A specific technical issue identified within a published standard/document. WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#340 opened Mar 17, 2021 by isotc211
@isotc211
3
Need new section for association coBoundary, and need to be edited. 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema editorial Editorial issue identified within a published standard/document. (typos, numbering, etc.) WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#337 opened Mar 17, 2021 by isotc211
@isotc211
"boundary" is an attribute, not operation 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema editorial Editorial issue identified within a published standard/document. (typos, numbering, etc.) WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#338 opened Mar 17, 2021 by isotc211
@isotc211
3
formal definition for attribute "primitive" should be changed. 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema editorial Editorial issue identified within a published standard/document. (typos, numbering, etc.) WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#332 opened Mar 17, 2021 by isotc211
@isotc211
the definition of operation equals is different. 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema technical A specific technical issue identified within a published standard/document. WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#333 opened Mar 17, 2021 by isotc211
@isotc211
the operation "Primitive" violates name convention. 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema technical A specific technical issue identified within a published standard/document. WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#330 opened Mar 17, 2021 by isotc211
@isotc211
formal definition for attribute "boundaryData" should be changed. 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema editorial Editorial issue identified within a published standard/document. (typos, numbering, etc.) WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#331 opened Mar 17, 2021 by isotc211
@isotc211
association role "complex" is missing 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema technical A specific technical issue identified within a published standard/document. WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#328 opened Mar 17, 2021 by isotc211
@isotc211
the description section for operation "asDirectedTopo" and "primitive" 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema technical A specific technical issue identified within a published standard/document. WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#329 opened Mar 17, 2021 by isotc211
@isotc211
description for attribute minimalComplex is missing 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema editorial Editorial issue identified within a published standard/document. (typos, numbering, etc.) WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#326 opened Mar 17, 2021 by isotc211
@isotc211
Package name is wrong 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema editorial Editorial issue identified within a published standard/document. (typos, numbering, etc.) WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#327 opened Mar 17, 2021 by isotc211
@isotc211
The definition of attribute coBoundary is different 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema technical A specific technical issue identified within a published standard/document. WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#324 opened Mar 17, 2021 by isotc211
@isotc211
the definition of attribute interior, exterior, closure, maximalComplex is different 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema technical A specific technical issue identified within a published standard/document. WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#325 opened Mar 17, 2021 by isotc211
@isotc211
section 9.3.1.2 should be divided. 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema editorial Editorial issue identified within a published standard/document. (typos, numbering, etc.) WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#321 opened Mar 17, 2021 by isotc211
Interface name should be changed. 19107 Geographic information — Spatial schema editorial Editorial issue identified within a published standard/document. (typos, numbering, etc.) WG9 ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information management
#322 opened Mar 17, 2021 by isotc211
@isotc211
ProTip! Find all open issues with in progress development work with linked:pr.