Skip to content

association role "complex" is missing #328

New issue
New issue
Open
Open
association role "complex" is missing#328
Assignees
isotc211
Labels
19107Geographic information — Spatial schemaWG9ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information managementtechnicalA specific technical issue identified within a published standard/document.
@isotc211

Description

@isotc211
isotc211
opened on Mar 17, 2021

Justification: In 10.1.3.3, the association "Complex" is bidirectional and have two association role "complex" and "element".

However, In UML, the "complex" is not defined.
Proposal: Please check the model and modify if needed.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

19107Geographic information — Spatial schemaWG9ISO/TC 211 WG9, Information managementtechnicalA specific technical issue identified within a published standard/document.

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions