Open
Description
Currently most models in cuml
match the sklearn
interface (or at least are intended to). The exception seems to be the models in cuml.tsa
, which match the interface in statsmodels
IIUC.
- Are we ok with different interfaces being implemented in this project (my guess is yes)?
- If so, should we use a separate base class than
cuml.internals.Base
for those that don't match the sklearn interface?
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels